Saral vs LinkedIn Recruiter
In reviewKeyword search over LinkedIn profiles, versus signal-based ranking with evidence and outreach on WhatsApp.
Last reviewed [date] · sources dated on the page

Compare
Fair, dated comparisons between Saral AI and the tools and services teams in India use to hire. Competitor claims come from their public pages.
Keyword search over LinkedIn profiles, versus signal-based ranking with evidence and outreach on WhatsApp.
Last reviewed [date] · sources dated on the page
A database of people who uploaded a resume, versus passive candidates found from public work.
Last reviewed [date] · sources dated on the page
Two AI sourcing tools compared on data, ranking transparency, outreach channels and India coverage.
Last reviewed [date] · sources dated on the page
Around 30% of annual salary per hire, versus credits from ₹2,000 a month.
Last reviewed [date] · sources dated on the page
| Feature | Job boards and resume databases | Recruitment agencies | Saral AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finds passive talent | Only people who applied | Through the recruiter’s network | Yes, from public signals |
| Evidence behind each match | Keywords | Recruiter judgement | Fit Score with linked evidence |
| Time to first shortlist | Days | 1–2 weeks | Minutes |
| Cost model | Seat licences | ~30% of annual salary | Credits, from ₹2,000 a month |
Saral vs recruitment agencies
Agencies typically charge around 30% of annual salary per hire. Compare that with a year of Saral Growth.
Assumes a 30% agency fee and Saral Growth at ₹18,900 a month, before GST. Your agency terms may differ.
Agency fees a year
₹45,00,000
Saral Growth a year
₹2,26,800
You keep, a year
₹42,73,200